Age of Strategy Forums

Tankhead wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 3:59 am Lol who said you need a fleshy weak spot to have armor?
Armored golems are usually common just like the ones without it.

Difference is armored Golems are practically super tanks and and is hard to take down.

read properly, i said SHIELD not ARMOR

godOfKings wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 10:06 am

Tankhead wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 3:59 am Lol who said you need a fleshy weak spot to have armor?
Armored golems are usually common just like the ones without it.

Difference is armored Golems are practically super tanks and and is hard to take down.

read properly, i said SHIELD not ARMOR

Same difference

1. Gnomes can't animate clay/stone/any other thing apart from metal.
2. They will be gnomish units, not dwarven ones.
3. No clay/stone golems.
4. Instead they CAN have some equipment (they are just mechanical humanoids. Some use their raw power for fighting while others use some equipment)
Also soon i will update stats for all of golems.

Also i really don't like stats of savra's variant.

Dwarves in main body of race are bad magical users and can't animate stone/clay/any other material.
Dwarves are good builders. Best ones. But they can't use any elemental magic and any other forms.

Also Alex said NO to any golems for main body of race. Gnomes only.

Well I get Alex answer but What im aware of dwarves are quite good at making golems in several fantasies

L.

Sad to hear...

How should we name them to be accepted..

No elemental creatures and elemental golems for dwarves themselves. For subs they could be. Or for some other races.

makazuwr32 wrote: ↑Fri Nov 30, 2018 4:10 pm No elemental creatures and elemental golems for dwarves themselves. For subs they could be. Or for some other races.

I'll move to humans than