Age of Strategy Forums

L4cus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:26 pm yeah yeah, ancient ones:
-cretan archer
-balearic slinger
-thracian phalxman
-is there any other?

DreJaDe wrote: ↑Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:56 pm

L4cus wrote: ↑Fri Jul 09, 2021 11:26 pm yeah yeah, ancient ones:
-cretan archer
-balearic slinger
-thracian phalxman
-is there any other?

What about Crusader?

Didn't they use to call for Crusader until the Crusader got enough of the romans?

To further buff the Roman's, could legionnaires (sic) get the ability to build roads or wooden forts of some kind?

L4cus wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 2:05 pm there is already a roman topic for a mega building, i think iots called roman castrum...is ur idea any different?

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 7:45 pm Merged.
With production this is clearly mega building.

Two notes:
- There is no need to create specific workers to build one or two things. Alternative workers would need to be different in other stats and have some reasoning why (in balance mainly).
- I don't recall any mention of fort/camp without production anywhere in new structures propositions. Tower without an attack could be very interesting addition.
There was auxilae outpost, but I was never against making it.
I am generally against:
- any building build on forest/hills having garrison allowing movement of units normally not capable of moving through such terrain
- anything with production, but not counted as factory
- anything protecting unit (completely, not by aura bonus), but allowing construction from inside
- anything counted as factory, but with not enough reason of existence (since making priory, seeing it as a mistake)

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:28 pm No wood structures with carry.
Ability to remove woods were brought to avoid that.

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 7:45 pm Merged.
With production this is clearly mega building.

Two notes:
- There is no need to create specific workers to build one or two things. Alternative workers would need to be different in other stats and have some reasoning why (in balance mainly).
- I don't recall any mention of fort/camp without production anywhere in new structures propositions. Tower without an attack could be very interesting addition.
There was auxilae outpost, but I was never against making it.
I am generally against:
- any building build on forest/hills having garrison allowing movement of units normally not capable of moving through such terrain
- anything with production, but not counted as factory
- anything protecting unit (completely, not by aura bonus), but allowing construction from inside
- anything counted as factory, but with not enough reason of existence (since making priory, seeing it as a mistake)

DreJaDe wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 12:21 am

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 7:45 pm Merged.
With production this is clearly mega building.

Two notes:
- There is no need to create specific workers to build one or two things. Alternative workers would need to be different in other stats and have some reasoning why (in balance mainly).
- I don't recall any mention of fort/camp without production anywhere in new structures propositions. Tower without an attack could be very interesting addition.
There was auxilae outpost, but I was never against making it.
I am generally against:
- any building build on forest/hills having garrison allowing movement of units normally not capable of moving through such terrain
- anything with production, but not counted as factory
- anything protecting unit (completely, not by aura bonus), but allowing construction from inside
- anything counted as factory, but with not enough reason of existence (since making priory, seeing it as a mistake)

Just to clear out
-the idea for the 3v3 mega building is only for map editor unit.
-same is true for worker since I cannot see how it can be done with normal workers being able to build them only in campaigns. I don't think there's any effect to add a structure to the build list of a worker. So instead, I suggested a map editor worker than can build them. Hmmm, maybe the other map editor worker can do the job.

I might have misunderstood this point

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Fri Apr 16, 2021 9:28 pm No wood structures with carry.
Ability to remove woods were brought to avoid that.

But for me, it meant that you didn't want any wooden garrison.

L4cus wrote: ↑Mon Feb 21, 2022 1:56 am

Endru1241 wrote: ↑Sun Feb 20, 2022 7:45 pm Merged.
With production this is clearly mega building.

Two notes:
- There is no need to create specific workers to build one or two things. Alternative workers would need to be different in other stats and have some reasoning why (in balance mainly).
- I don't recall any mention of fort/camp without production anywhere in new structures propositions. Tower without an attack could be very interesting addition.
There was auxilae outpost, but I was never against making it.
I am generally against:
- any building build on forest/hills having garrison allowing movement of units normally not capable of moving through such terrain
- anything with production, but not counted as factory
- anything protecting unit (completely, not by aura bonus), but allowing construction from inside
- anything counted as factory, but with not enough reason of existence (since making priory, seeing it as a mistake)

For tower without attack i was thinking of "atalay" capable of garriaoning ranged units boosting their attack and range maybe at the cost that its capturable and units inside get the damage instead of atalay, only empty atalay woudl get damage

Auxilae outpost? Forgot about it jeje, i think with mega and roman garrison is enought, but if there the will of someone to make the image plus time and will to make the json (i can do it if u ask me) then i think it would be a good adition...