Age of Strategy Forums

something that was very similar and that the tier 3 of troops as archer and archer on horseback have 1/1. the man at arms should also have 1/1 of armor, both because it’s a very considerable upgrade of tier 3 giving a small and significant Hp bonus and a good increase in damage and 1 armor point, but kind of like piercing armor I do not follow, in my opinion it would not be very appealing to have 1 piercing armor in the man at arms because practically a unit like cavalry, archer and others tier 1 can significantly end your Hp and the improvements in the blacksmith, well, no and tray that you have.

So that is my point

It's not so bad proposition for current stats and game balance, but I am planning ranged units nerf (lowering mid and end game damage), so let's leave it for now.