Age of Strategy Forums

I think the new "turns to AI" version can be irritating sometimes (eg. on a 1v1 it can be irritating, if someone does not want to play with an AI instead of a human player)

so i think:
- if KickedPlayer has at least one teammate (still alive) than turn the player to AI -> to give the chance for the reamining teammate to kick the opponnents' ass)
- if KickedPlayer has no teammate (alive) AND by losing the game would end the game than it stop playing and loses and the Game Ends -> as earlier was: so no irritation to force playing with AI if someone wanted a human opponent.
- if KickedPlayer has no teammate (alive) AND by losing the game would end the game AND it is a BET game, than it turns to AI -> because we dont want a breach for easy bet-game-gems (an easy way: start the bet game, join from other phone, and wait a while and in first turn kick the enemy - only for receive the gem reward)
- if KickedPlayer has no teammate (alive) AND by losing the game would NOT end the game than all player units are removed and TC-s become neutral -> to let the remaining fighting players occupy them easily.

what do you think?

I don't really play 1 vs 1 very often, but it sounds good

How about the teammate has a chance to ttake over maybe...

If Ollie is saying a human player takes over his allies army and tc in a no show multiplayer game I agree totally. I don't know why but when I play with AI multiplayer Ally they always seem to get in my way, its like they work against you instead of an over all group effort?

Only issue with a teammate is who gets to take over when it is a 3 teammate game?

Possibly closest ally to the void,either by unit or tc its for the good of all in alliance anyway no matter who gets the extra tc.

I played a 3 player gem game. The other two ended up quiting causing me to fight the AI. I agree that if a player quits, the AI should take over. However if all players quit except for one, then the remaining player should win automatically without having to knock off the computers to get the gem prize.

Thoughts?

Agree or at least give you the option to go ahead and play or get back the gems you have bet? Kinda like the Draw Option you mentioned at one time which was a good idea as well!

I completely agree.
If you remain the last player in game you should atomatically win the bet (the total for every starting player) and you shoud have the option to continue playing (with no other prize, of course)

there was a topic about it and i suggested a rule when to turn to AI and so on.
please link here that topic so i can merge it -thanks.

this one?
viewtopic.php?f=8&t=1606

yes thanks.

Maybe in Multiplayer mode we could have a setting that instead of computer taking over player is resigned when kicked?

(merged) please check if we have such topic already before posting.

I like the addition where if a player get kicked out of a gane, the AI takes over. An update to this feature should be when there is just 1 active player and all AI players have taken control would be to allow the one active player the option to end the game instead of playing all the AI to the end. This would be great for gem games on large maps. The last active player is rewarded the gems.

(merged) please check if we have such topic already before posting.

Lol 4 topics merged