Page 1 of 1
man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:26 am
by silentz27
Its the third improvement of swordman have a new look and its have additional ability like man at arms
Re: man at arms to man at wars
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:31 am
by Hardeep
man at wars seems a little off key...
but im all for new upgrades to the swordsman
maybe call it something like imperial footman
upgraded from broad swordsman
But more expensive and powerful than man at arms?
Re: man at arms to man at wars
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 2:34 am
by silentz27
Your right what you think is the better name for the man at wars??
Re: man at arms to man at wars
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:09 am
by Ness
I think at this man at wars could be too op
Re: man at arms to man at wars
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:15 am
by Stratego (dev)
yes, i dont think we need a 4th upgrade - at least not yet.
there are many other (basic) gaps in unit palette (eg. we have no any ship upgrades)
Re: man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 4:48 am
by silentz27
Ahehe tnx for the answer sir look for my other ideas I have a ship upgrade
Re: man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 10:46 am
by Ness
Ship upradge were already
Re: man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2015 11:02 am
by silentz27
Uhm ok as you said
Re: man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 1:51 am
by DoomCarrot
what the heck is a man at war.
Re: man at arms to man at wars - ANSWERED
Posted: Thu Apr 30, 2015 4:19 am
by silentz27
Haha
Re: man at arms to man at wars
Posted: Wed Feb 21, 2018 2:11 am
by COOLguy
Stratego (dev) wrote:yes, i dont think we need a 4th upgrade - at least not yet.
there are many other (basic) gaps in unit palette (eg. we have no any ship upgrades)
ANSWERED. Thanks to mak for finding these