Age of Strategy Forums

I was thinking that suppose a player 1 occupies tc of player 2 who had built a structure (say barrack) and a castle for it . After loosing the tc, these structures remain under player 2. So what if we make a rule that the player 1 cannot build any structure/ castle for the captured tc unless he destroys 1 castle/ structure of player 2? This way one could check the other player's expansion. Other wise it becomes very difficult to re occupy the tc as well as destroy the structures and castles built against it(just my opinion)
How does this sound?

it seems too tricky... and we can't, in fog maps, take count of how many tc,s/factories/castles a player have

We dont have to. Simple rule- if you capture a tc , you can build a structure only after destroying 1 of the same player. Same for castle. If the player doesnot have any, or maybe less than max possible value then he is allowed to build else not

I personally prefer it the way it is at the moment. I think this would get a little annoying after a while.

i agree, it would over-complicate game.