Age of Strategy Forums

I belive that for a unit that costs 3, 16 hp and 8 atk is bad. Here are my suggested stats:
Cost: 2
Hp 19
Atk 9
Arm/p.arm 1/1
Speed 3
Sight 4
Description: a lizardman warrior wielding a mace. A good fighter.
What do you think

i think that stat will be similarly to elite maceman.

What if the cost is 4? maceman & elite
for maceman
hp:21/21
attack:9
Speed:3
sight:4
armor:0
pierce:2
range:1
spell resist:20%
buildable at:tcs,swamp barracks

for elite maceman
cost:4
hp:28/28
attack:10
Speed:3
sight:4
armor:2
pierce:2
range:1
spell resist:50%
buildable at:tcs,swamp barracks

L maceman:
Cost: 3
Hp: 21
Attack power: 9
Armor:0
Peirce armor: 1
Speed:3
Sight:4
Spell Resist:0
Bonus against infantry units 75%


L Elite maceman:
Cost: 3
Hp: 28
Attack power: 10
Armor:1
Peirce armor: 2
Speed:3
Sight:4
Spell Resist:20
Bonus against infantry units 75%

Well... if u want to keep his cost at 3 at least boost his stats more. His stats are nearly the stats of a human warrior which costs 2, but he is still costing 3 even with stats similar to warrior. So either drop cost or raise stats. And btw instead of 0/2 i think armor could be 1/1 because since lizardmen have really hard scales it makes sense that he has a bit of close combat armor imo.

And the elites status is also bad. He costs the same as knight and is way worse. And btw, most unit upgrades cost exactly the same as their predecessors (for ex. The knight costs 4 and the heavy knight also costs 4 but with slightly higher atk and hp. Try doing same to the elite maceman.)

you got me. ok the cost is 2

Archived