Age of Strategy Forums

Unit that has 5x5 aura that can be change. Cost=8 turns at castle. Action need to be used to change aura.
List of aura:
Defensive position (all units in radius +armor and +pierce armor)
Offensive position (all units in radius +power)
Mobilisation (all units in radius +speed)
Oratorical Speech (all units in radius +spell ressistance)

You know this is a really cool idea

Instead, there must be generals for specific fields like infantry,cavalry or ranged who provide buffs to units of their respective fields.
Eg.-a cavalry general giving an attack bonus to all cavalries within their aura radius.
This will game much more realistic.

I think cavalry general should use glaive it would look really cool, I was planning for such a unit before

This is a good idea.

Well to make things straight the player is the general! Maybe a change of name would be good, like leader or battle commander.

I m not a general, i m THE GOD OF KINGS!!! so i dont see y this name is wrong , although there does exist another general *hinting at general brave*,

but long story short, players have different names, they can b a god of all the units they control if they want to, no one needs to b a general to command everything his soldiers will do

A general leads men and calls the shots, the player dose this action it dose not depend on the name! LOL

Who's asking for me?

But then again a king controls how a general shall lead his army, and I control how I will lead my own army so m I a general or a king? Answer: I m a god of both the kings and the generals under them, pretty sure generals can't control exactly which worker shall build which tower or siege, but a god can control each person's individual decision. Only if the unit's name was god would it b wrong, but a general is okay, even a king is okay

I'm pretty sure the general isn't you, who thought of this?

godOfKings wrote:But then again a king controls how a general shall lead his army, and I control how I will lead my own army so m I a general or a king? Answer: I m a god of both the kings and the generals under them, pretty sure generals can't control exactly which worker shall build which tower or siege, but a god can control each person's individual decision. Only if the unit's name was god would it b wrong, but a general is okay, even a king is okay

like I say again, to get it through your thick skull. THE PLAYER IS THE KING AND OR GENERAL!the unit "samuelch" is trying to post is a unit that gives other units ability's that other wise would not be possible. However.... Thanks to some turbulent conditions and plain logic we cannot name this unit general! we must find another name.

Perhaps Chamberlain, Courtier, Steward, lord or lady, Squire. But I'm fine with a low ranking general as I am head general of the Armed Forces of Warfell

yeah i'm the leader of the Belfrean people.

What's your title and what's your people history?

well I wrote a whole story about it and in short, Belfry a general of the vergiston empire under king stratego fought many battles in part one and two then in part three (or book three) Godofkings units with other kingdoms and battles stratego and coolguy. In the fight both are killed but Godofkings is stopped.

Sounds like a 'great' story.

Actually stratego survives, his general belfry leads a decoy army to fight against godOfKings, giving stratego the time needed to escape, but unfortunately belfry falls in battle after defending bravely for a long time

This might actually b a good story for campaign


As for my story, I believe my signature explains everything

Yes I think your right! And today I live his legend with 777 at the end. So lets get back on topic shall we.

Rename to commander?

I think that is a good name.