Age of Strategy Forums

One of the oldest ents, who remebers the very first conflicts with orcs and undeads.

Health: 200
Attack: 20 (affected by nature tech)
Range: 2
Defence: 6/15
Speed: 2
Sight: 5
Actions/turn: 1
Spell resist: 100%
Carry capacity: 0 (is affected by treetop archery)
Trainable at Great Tree
Cost 10 Turns
Affected by fire
Standart bonuses to buildings, for bonuses to it counts as giant.

Can't be transported by wagons.

More like dwarf's unit.

For dwarfes i wanted to suggest Golem automatons production system.
After they'll be implemented.
And this is Old giant creature of the stones... It is more nature than dwarven.

I can't really see elves allied with giants...

Just play WC3 (Warcraft 3).
They are slow with hard and very slow attack.
Also in wc3 Night elves are leaving on the mountain for several thousand years, they made a contact with most of fauna that lives on that mountain. And they also grew on it their forests. But Mountain giants in WC3 are ancient friends and allies of Night elves (in lore they made a contact during first Burning legion invasion thousands years ago).
Also mountain giants are not exactly just an animated living rock like Golems.They have feelings and they are allied with NE (night elves) because Legion wanted to destroy their home and elves when they came already tried to protect it...

Our elves are not night elves. Try considering settings like d&d.

Anyway there are many options that might fit elves in a better way.

updated first post

+1
Interesting.
I love Durthu... Coedil... Adahnu....
I like the idea

With the addition of bone scourge and cyclops, I'd say we should add this unit to help elves compensate.

Looks like a wolf tree.

Or this

Let's like ours or legs like that?

I like number 2 better, looks like an elder
Probably call it elder wood.

I might prefer the wolf tree.

Elder wood is just a weak tree who can only storytelling
This one is elder of war — who survived for centuries of conflicts and became really tough.

So how harm hardened over time from the many battle scars it had gotten, got it.

I would say really scar two, I think you mean it grown to have tough bark and resistance to fire.

I will need to think about this.
It will be really hard for some races to take this down without fire.

Every race has fire humans have mages, drake knights, and dragons, orcs have goblins, elves have fire archer, undead have death knight and fire skull thrower, kobolds have many, dwarves have mother men.

Dwarves have WHAT?
Dwarves right now have fire only from their towers with range 5 and from theur mega building.
Humans have fire also from towers and from castle.

This unit would basically be treated like any other troll threat of ent threat.

Humans have mages, drake knights, and dragons. Dwarves have a dwarve n mother men and some more soon to come. This units not getting implemented right after its done, look how long some units took.

Dwarven mother?
No they don't have any mothers ingame.
Alas i want to see neutral dwarven civilians...

I think he is saying mortar.

Their mortars don't have "burning weapon" passive. Just like catapult of humans. They both DON'T apply burning effects to hit units.

Right now dwarves are the only race (i forgot about fireballs of humans) without mobile burning scource.

Hm, they must of destroyed the enemy so fast that I thought they did have fire weopon passive, intresting...

Updated stats.

Just needs an image, I'll think of something with those examples.