Age of Strategy Forums

resources to make the gameplay more interesting, instead of just choosing and waiting for the units to be trained, they also had a system of resources! .stone, wood, iron, metal, steel, gold in order to make the players' choices more strategic.

Morningwarrior wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 4:32 am resources to make the gameplay more interesting, instead of just choosing and waiting for the units to be trained, they also had a system of resources! .stone, wood, iron, metal, steel, gold in order to make the players' choices more strategic.

This is a tbs game. Only gold and time is used as resource. In addition to that, we already have the buildings limit. I think is ok, but maybe it could work, getting gold from tc every turn.

I feel like even if this is approved it might take a long time to encode......

Idk...any comments?dev?design leaders?forum veterans?

If u want gold, make another mod game with aos engine

godOfKings wrote: ↑Mon Feb 10, 2020 1:32 pm If u want gold, make another mod game with aos engine

I don't like that idea, but gold is more posible than any other resource. That's w i say

I don't have a link, but I recall list of the things that won't be ever imlemented in AoS.
One of them was resources.

It's just against basic design of AoS.

More "strategic" or more limited?

It's a bad idea to me.

More,more.and i do no what game engine hes use,maybe i can help in this questions

Having a resource like gold would enhance the game in several ways.
It would add strategy since mines and trade routes would need to be controlled or attacked, instead of town centers being the only important locations.
It would be nice for a unit to be expensive without having to wait forever for it sometimes.
In a tbs game it's nice to keep the number of units limited, rather than being constantly produced.

Please do not change this game into warcraft 3.