Age of Strategy Forums

.

I think you forgot that they need to be in 3 unit form in 64px

Well, if you're already planning for it. Pls specify.

DreJaDe wrote: ↑Sun May 10, 2020 1:23 am I think you forgot that they need to be in 3 unit form in 64px

Well, if you're already planning for it. Pls specify.

Yeah im just figuring the positioning for now as it is, in the meanwhile ill keep doing this posts, triying to figue out the groupings would only stop my progress.

Mind if I do it?

Here

I think im really bad commentator and i will not comment this...

Why is there something wrong?

QuadrupoleStrat wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 5:51 pmHere

Splendid quote you are doing a great job

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 8:19 pm

QuadrupoleStrat wrote: ↑Fri May 29, 2020 5:51 pmHere

Splendid quote you are doing a great job

Yes

I have seen ur work at russian pikemen (or whatever). Plis just focus on generic units first just like this one.
Also, dont forget to agree withh stats for this unit.
Dont forget we domt have to follow aos units stats

generic european pavise crossbowman

.

Looking good! I guess this could be a mercenary unit?

It needs team colours and shadows though, and if possible, could you make the men stand a bit closer together? Same with the pikeman, I like them but they look very spread out, if you could pack them a bit more tightly it would be awesome.

Thanks

sure i can make them closer

crossbow

pikemen

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Sun May 31, 2020 10:42 pmcrossbow

Wait, do you copy them from Age of strategy?

Maxbirykov2004 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2020 9:21 am

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Sun May 31, 2020 10:42 pmcrossbow

Wait, do you copy them from Age of strategy?

when we were working in the pavise crossbowman sprite this was one of my suggestions, the sprite is mine

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2020 12:47 pm

Maxbirykov2004 wrote: ↑Mon Jun 01, 2020 9:21 am

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Sun May 31, 2020 10:42 pmcrossbow

Wait, do you copy them from Age of strategy?

when we were working in the pavise crossbowman sprite this was one of my suggestions, the sprite is mine

Amm, ok, im sorry for suspicious, i have some experience in copyrights and pirating files ...

generic early 17th century musketeers

generic early 17th century pikemen

early 17th century halberdiers

They look great. But remember early 17th century armies were very similar to late 16th armie even arms. So i still dont understand whats the difference... i mean, they would fit pretty well as 16th century units.
If u want a difference, maybe techs for that period to make those units better, but an entire new unit...meh...
If u are making them as unplayable units like some units at aos made for map editor and campaigns then its fine.

since we arent adding early 17yh century, theyll be campaign units

We are. As i said, musket upgrade line will be 16th, 17th and 18th century. Also, the pikemen upgrade line will be 15th 16th 17th century...

generic men at arms

Hmm pretty good

generic mounted arquebusiers

generic 17th century light cavalry

About mounted arquebuiser...its name should be mounted gunner. arquebus was still pretty heavy to carry on horseback. also, arquebus was not the chosen arm for firearm cavalry. the most generic way to call it should be mounted gunner