Age of Strategy Forums

polishing the british is our priority, so it would work as an pilot faction for the others. With British we will implement all basic mechanics and test other.
So i would be glad if you consider this fact.

Any task for me?

i can not say nothing but "look for ideas". right now on classes, soon my exams.
marines would be very good, and ships of the line
btw, we need defences
and an upgrade for the tc, similar to star-fortress cities would be nice too

Any task that i can help with?

implementaion of units like halberdier and men atarms. all factions will have them, so its very usefull

L4cus wrote: ↑Sun Sep 06, 2020 12:57 pm implementaion of units like halberdier and men atarms. all factions will have them, so its very usefull

Ok...

btw, i would like to fix the issues and add the lefting images first
so please share them here.
DONT SHARE NEW UNITS, JUST THE UNITS THAT NEED A IMAGE OR HAS A NEW IMAGE WAINTING FOR IMPLEMENTATION AND HAS BEEN APROVED.
right now i am off with college stuffs, so knowing what is needed to fix the current units and effects would help to fix it faster when i get free time

These should be prioritised. They are available mostly from the start, some from age 1

Once these are in, there are many more from later ages.

Remember the "men at arms" are actually footknights (excepted "mounted men at arms", and "dismounted men at arms")

Wow...

oh yes, the pikeman

My reworked man at arms

Whats the greatsword meant to be?

the men at arms are foot knights... anyway I thought you guys wanted to replace warhammer foot knight with the other pole arm one you made, Gral. I posted it earlier

The greatsword should have 3 men lol

werent the 2 meant to coexist?

like having men at arms and knigths at the same time?

lets wait for l4cus to clarify this one

also, was the greatsword planned? i dont remember anything about it

Yes we will have both. But the images which are named "men at arms" are actually the footknight images. We dnt have men at arms images yes. And we didnt want a footknight with a warhammer, we wanted one with a polearm, so the image you made is replacing the imsge with a warhammer

well the images quad originally made were meant to be men at arms so the knights can look different with gothic armor (i propose)

so the men at arms are done already we just need more knight images

if im wrong can you clarify me the roles of the units?

beacuse if i understand correctly there will be just 2 men at arms units and the rest are knights right? with more diverse roles, i tought different

L4cus and some others, I think you were there also, decided on discord that the men at arms images are for footknights, so idk

Both men at arms and footknights will have:
sword and shield
polearm
halberd

All factions will have all men at arms. Which foot knight types you can use depend on your faction. For example, one faction can only make knights with sword and shield, another can make only knights with polearm, but everyone can make men at arms. Knights will be men at arms but stronger

At least this was the plan, maybe it has changed

oooo i see didnt read those messages well ill change them to look more knightly then xd

i apologize for the confusion

what should the dismounted or foor men at arms should look like?

Now i am confused! xd
Ok, i think we decided this on the men at arms topic, so it should be discussed there any image change or role or etc
btw, i will read it again since i dont remember well

ok, i see there is a lot of chaos on the topics. this is the resolution:
men at arms version:
-sword and shield
-halberd
-polehammer
-mounted sword (with dismount ability)
-dismounted sword (with mount ability)
-mounted lancer (without dismount abilty)

knights versions:
-mounted warhammer
-mounted sword
-mounted lance
-foot longsword
-foot warhammer

yeah, some changes and additions jejeje. work for me!

cool! Thanks for clearing it up.

So, what about these images, are they for men at arms again?

and mounted lance knight right?

Gral.Sturnn wrote: ↑Tue Sep 08, 2020 5:47 pm and mounted lance knight right?

my mistake sorry, already edited

Sure...