Age of Strategy Forums

Pretty simple, what if lets say, i wanted to play the 16thc and the 16thc only in a Multiplayer match restricting the possibility of advancing through other eras?

Its pretty simple id say

Great idea. It can give some variety of game types.
+we should add it into random games (player can choose) and into some historical campaigns (map creator can choose)

this would be the best possible addition for the gameplay!
i support this, and ur idea @Maxbirykov2004 would be the best aplication of this idea. this opens lots of possibilities for multiplayer experience.

You can actually restrict the units to be built via trigger editor [in your maps only tho, not in multiplayer] (remove units from buildlist), or by making the game era-based instead too. First Tech Age(1600s), Second Tech Age(1700s), Third(1800s). However, adding a new feature like this would cost Stratego some time. I don't know if he agrees on this, but this is actually a good idea...

It could be used for AOWW too, you would be able to select either the first or second world war periods if units from ww1 ever get added.

Yes, this is a great idea. It would be very useful for players.

Well... What actually @Stratego (dev) is thinking about this idea?

Harchie Hirondo wrote: ↑Wed Jan 06, 2021 2:59 pm by making the game era-based instead too. First Tech Age(1600s), Second Tech Age(1700s), Third(1800s).

I support this very much.

when eras will bein all games it will be definitely in.
until that i handle it with lower priority (currently only one published version has eras )

Stratego (dev) wrote: ↑Thu May 20, 2021 11:44 am when eras will bein all games it will be definitely in.
until that i handle it with lower priority (currently only one published version has eras )

awesome!!!